Mardi, 13 Novembre 2018
Latest news
Main » The President Wants To Alter The Constitution And Ignore International Law

The President Wants To Alter The Constitution And Ignore International Law

05 Novembre 2018

President Donald Trump vowed to bring the practice of birthright citizenship to a halt with an executive order. "Guess what. You don't", he told Axios.

On July 28, 1868, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. constitution was ratified. Titled 'United States v Wong Kim Ark, ' the birthright citizenship issue was dealt with by the Supreme Court. And babies that are born on US soil as a part of the "birth tourism" that has parents coming to America from Asia to give birth so that the baby, now a holder of a USA passport, can return for school and other benefits. In this ruling, the Supreme Court determined that African slaves were not considered American citizens despite being born in America. In a 6-2 ruling, it touched on the text and history of the actual amendment only lightly and made a decision to cement the definition of citizenship we'd inherited from English common law, where everyone born in the country is treated as a natural subject.

As a candidate, Trump proposed doing away with birthright citizenship, which he wrongly called the "biggest magnet for illegal immigration". "The process to enact a constitutional amendment is exceptionally hard and designed that way".

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."
.

The logical conclusion stemming from these precepts is that illegal aliens who are physically present in the United States, but who have not "entered" the United States, lack constitutional rights. Furthermore, Trump announced Wednesday that the number of military troops deployed to the U.S.

Velasquez cited another big reason for Trump's anti-Latino anti-immigrant stands: He ignores USA policy south of the border.

It's time for us to fix the constitutional loophole that created them. American Indians residing on tribal lands were not subject to USA law because the tribes exercised considerable self-governance. If we abolish birthright citizenship, all pregnant women will be treated the same, whether they are Americans or citizens of some other country: All babies will have the same citizenship as their mothers.

The 14th Amendment's drafting history supports this reading. Ten of those proposed Amendments were timely ratified and became the Bill of Rights. But "who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers" is clearly a restrictive clause modifying "foreigners" and "aliens", with those two words being synonymous here.

In the US, changing birthright citizenship might not be so easy.

Yet should Trump issue an executive order and lose in the Supreme Court, the controversy could raise public consciousness and force Congress to enact legislation to clarify what the 14th Amendment precisely means.

Sen. John Conness, R-Calif., responded yes, those children were citizens. The state stepped up enforcement recently, amid mounting anti-immigrant sentiment from the far right. Targeting birthright citizenship certainly doesn't deviate far from this troubling lineage. The court ruled, "In establishing loss of citizenship, the government must prove an intent to surrender United States citizenship, not just the voluntary commission of an expatriating act such as swearing allegiance to a foreign nation".

Today's immigration critics are also correct to point out that the 14th Amendment wasn't written with illegal immigration in mind, as there were no immigration restrictions yet in 1868 when it was adopted. "They're full citizens", he said.

The federal government and the states would have to pour even more resources into an already dysfunctional bureaucracy that can not even control the borders.

"The weakest members of American society are callously being used by President Trump for political expediency and that is unconscionable", said AHRC Executive Director Ihad Ahmad. "As a conservative, I'm a believer in following the plain text of the Constitution, and I think in this case the 14th Amendment is pretty clear, and that would involve a very, very lengthy constitutional process".

The President Wants To Alter The Constitution And Ignore International Law